Ilustración de la familia.
Ilustración de la familia.
Cuál es la mejor opción AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D o AMD Ryzen 5 7500F? ¿Qué procesador es más rápido?
Compare the available specifications of these models.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D has a base frequency of 4 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en 2025-11-12.
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a base frequency of 3.7 GHz. 6 / 12 CPU Cores / Threads. Stated TDP / base power 65 W. Publicado en 2023-07-22.
Razones a tener en cuenta Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 8% mejor velocidad de reloj
3.7 GHz
Razones a tener en cuenta Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 11 % higher specified turbo frequency
4.5 GHz
AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D
Información sobre los procesadores que se comparan, serie, generación y segmento de mercado.
Ryzen
Desktops / Boxed Processor
Desktop
Ryzen 7000 Series
Core counts, threads, cache and clock modes describe the CPU configuration. Performance depends on the workload and comparable measured results.
3.7 GHz
6
12
5 GHz
Sí
La gráfica interna no afecta al rendimiento de la CPU, realiza el trabajo de la tarjeta gráfica en su ausencia o en dispositivos móviles.
-
None
-
Tipos, cantidad de canales de RAM soportados por AMD Ryzen 5 7500F y AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D. Dependiendo de las placas base, pueden admitirse frecuencias de memoria más altas o más bajas.
2
DDR5
PCIe 5.0
Compara los requisitos del TDP AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D y AMD Ryzen 5 7500F Power specifications describe different manufacturer limits. TDP, base power and maximum turbo power are separate values; they do not establish measured system consumption.
65 W
95 °C
Arquitectura, interfaces, instrucciones adicionales soportadas por AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D y AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, tecnologías de máquinas virtuales y tecnología de procesos.
Raphael AM5
6 MB
32 MB
2023-07-22
AM5
TSMC 5nm FinFET
Shared tests with results for both models: 3
Each row uses one Blender version, operating system and compute backend.
| Test and settings | AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blender 5.2.0 / CPU / Linux | 230.693916 samples/min Submissions: 7 | 219.24262 samples/min Submissions: 18 | -5.0 % |
| Blender 5.1.1 / CPU / Windows | 210.918373 samples/min Submissions: 12 | 211.016448 samples/min Submissions: 32 | +0.0 % |
| Blender 4.5.0 / CPU / Windows | 192.650569 samples/min Submissions: 5 | 193.086364 samples/min Submissions: 85 | +0.2 % |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
Results were obtained on the reported systems. Test versions and settings remain separate; incomplete conditions do not support calculated model performance differences.
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | 9236.168837 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.26.0 / 1M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 32 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. / ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI Duration: 108.27 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
| Model | Result | Reported conditions |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D | 7078.578593 H/s | RandomX / XMRig 6.25.0 / 10M / 12 threads / windows System RAM: 16 GB OS: Windows NT 10.0 Motherboard: ASRock / A620AM-HVS Duration: 1412.713 s User-submitted run; tuning and power settings are incomplete. |
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
