Quel est le meilleur choix ? ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 ou INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4? Quelle carte graphique est la plus rapide ?
Nous avons préparé un comparatif pour vous aider à choisir la meilleure carte graphique. Comparez leurs spécifications et leurs benchmarks.
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 has a base frequency of 1.626 GHz. Taille de la mémoire 8 GB. Type de mémoire GDDR6. Sorti en Q4/2021.
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4 has a base frequency of 1.620 GHz+ 8 %. Taille de la mémoire 8 GB. Type de mémoire GDDR5. Sorti en Q2/2016.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
place
Positions communes ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
Raisons de considérer Place dans le classement général
(sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)
place
Positions communes INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4 GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600
Comparaison des données techniques de base des cartes graphiques ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 et INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4, puce, unités de traitement de l'information.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
15
GP104-200-A1
64
1920
120
Video memory capacity, type, bus width and bandwidth describe different properties. These values alone do not determine graphics performance.
262 GB/s
256 bit
8 GB
2050 MHz
GDDR5
Published GPU clock frequencies describe different operating modes. Clock speed alone does not determine graphics performance.
1620 MHz + 8%
1822 MHz + 8%
-
Oui
Graphics card power limits and recommended system power supply describe different specifications.
-
200 W+ 33 %
-
Types et tailles de refroidisseurs pour le système de refroidissement des cartes graphiques ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 et INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4.
Air cooling
Axial
3 x 90 mm
1 x 50 mm
0 dB / Silent
-
Connectivité et connexions.
3 × DisplayPort 1.4
1 × DVI
2.2
1 × HDMI 2.0b
4
PCIe 3.0 x16
1 x 8-Pin
-
-
Des données techniques utilisées à leur plein potentiel dans les jeux informatiques.
12_1
Non
ASUS Aura Sync, GIGABYTE RGB Fusion, MSI Mystic Light
7680 × 4320
Non
Prise en charge intégrée des normes de compression vidéo et image.
Non
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
La différence de taille, de poids et de fente des appareils comparés
109 mm
302 mm
3 PCIe-Slots
-
-
Comparaison des interfaces et des dates de sortie des GPU INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4 et ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600.
-
-
C107V4-1SDN-P5DNX
16 nm
Q2/2016
Shared tests with results for both models: 8
Each row is a separate graphics subtest. Scores are not game FPS.
| Test and settings | ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 | INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 8404 points Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Driver: 24.1.1Application version unreported | 5945 points Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Driver: 551.23Application version unreported | Complete test conditions unreported |
Each row uses one game, resolution, test suite and graphics mode.
| Test and settings | ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 | INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4 | Result difference¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 / 1920x1080 / Ultra / Native / RT off | 75.9 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Graphics API: VulkanRendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 24.1.1 | 52.2 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Graphics API: VulkanRendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Counter-Strike 2 / 1920x1080 / High / Native / RT off | 271.2 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 24.1.1 | 229.4 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Cyberpunk 2077 / 1920x1080 / High / Native / RT off | 54.5 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Game build: Phantom Liberty / Patch 2.11Driver: 24.1.1 | 35.2 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Game build: Phantom Liberty / Patch 2.11Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Diablo IV / 1920x1080 / Medium / Native / RT off | 169.5 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 24.1.1 | 122.6 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Dota 2 / 1920x1080 / Maximum / Native / RT off | 217.3 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 24.1.1 | 209.7 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Graphics API: DirectX 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| F1 23 / 1920x1080 / High / 16x AF / TAA + FidelityFX Sharpening / Native / RT off | 170.5 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 24.1.1 | 111.9 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
| Ratchet & Clank / 1920x1080 / High / TAA / Native / RT off | 58.4 FPS Base GPU test: RX 6600 8 GB, 132 W VRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 24.1.1 | 41.2 FPS Base GPU test: Founders Edition Tested board: Founders EditionVRAM: 8 GBTest CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900System RAM: 32 GB DDR5-5200CL38OS: Windows 11Rendering: Native (no FSR/DLSS)Driver: 551.23 | Complete test conditions unreported |
¹ Difference of the second result relative to the first in that row. No percentage is calculated for different upscaling algorithms. This compares published results, not a universal performance index.
A base GPU test is a reference for cards using that GPU and the same memory capacity. Board overclocking, cooling and power limits can change the result.
These results have no shared test of both models with the same version and settings. They are shown separately without a percentage difference.
En vous basant sur les résultats de plusieurs benchmarks populaires, vous pouvez estimer plus précisément la différence de performances entre ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 et INNO3D GeForce GTX 1070 iCHILL X4.
Comparez les benchmarks synthétiques et choisissez la meilleure carte graphique pour vous !
These are saved results from the earlier catalog. Measurement dates and test configurations were not recorded. Models with no comparable results are omitted.
Recent models: test results with identified primary sources — Game frame rates
Archived results. The original measurement method and test conditions have not been verified.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
Higher values are better in this metric.
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
