Select processor 1
Select processor 2
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2018
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Released
Q4/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1

What's the best choice ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB or INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1? Which graphics card is faster?

We have prepared a comparison to help you choose the best graphics card. Compare their specifications and benchmarks.

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has a maximum frequency of 1.392 GHz. Memory size 3 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q2/2018.

INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1 has a maximum frequency of 1.290 GHz. Memory size 4 GB. Memory type GDDR5. Released in Q4/2016.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2961 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 7% better clock speed

    1.392 GHz left arrow 1.290 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2932 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2937 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2876 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2822 left arrow score
  • More memory

    25% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 3 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2987 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2910 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2841 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2634 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2734 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2763 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2138 place

Specifications

Technical data
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1 INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1
General info

Comparison of basic technical data of graphics cards ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1, chip, information processing units.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-301-A1 left arrow GP107-400-A1
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    24 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    48 left arrow 48
Memory settings

Comparison of the amount of memory on board graphics cards. The more the better.

  • Memory Size
    3 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 1.752 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    84 GB/s left arrow 112 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    96 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock frequency

Let's compare the memory frequency of graphics cards ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1. The higher the better.

  • Base Clock
    1.392 GHz left arrow 1.290 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.518 GHz left arrow 1.392 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Connectors, the number of thermal watts emitted in normal mode and at overclocking.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow
Cooler & Fans type

Types and sizes of coolers for graphics card cooling system ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    1 x 80 mm left arrow 1 x 90 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

Connectivity and connections.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    -- left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical data

Technical data that is used to its full potential in computer games.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

Built-in support for video and image compression standards.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

The difference in size, weight and slot of the compared devices

  • Length
    192 mm left arrow 145 mm
  • Height
    111 mm left arrow 100 mm
  • Width
    37 mm left arrow --
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
More information

Comparison of interfaces and release dates for GPU INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1 and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q2/2018 left arrow Q4/2016
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    PH-GTX1050-3G left arrow N105T-1SDV-M5CM
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow --

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

Based on the results of several popular benchmarks, you can more accurately estimate the performance difference between ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1.

Compare synthetic benchmarks and choose the best graphics card for you!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
2.33
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2.14
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
15 fps (avg)
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
17 fps (avg)
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
9 fps (avg)
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
10 fps (avg)
INNO3D GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Compact X1
-->

Latest comparisons